Professor Bryan Pfaffenberger
For more than a century, voting
machines have helped shape
American political history.
The chaos of the 2000
presidential election in Florida drew
attention to the crucial role that
voting machines played in shaping
the outcome of that election. But
Bryan Pfaffenberger, associate
professor in the Department of
Science, Technology, and Society at
U.Va.’s School of Engineering and
Applied Science (SEAS), believes
there is value in understanding
that the interaction between voting
technology and culture has been going
on for more than a century.
Pfaffenberger is studying the history
of mechanical-lever voting machines.
His research focuses on the machines’
introduction in New York State in
1892 to 1925, when the technology was
employed throughout the state.
“There’s an almost exact parallel
between the debate we’re having today
concerning electronic voting machines
and the equally divisive but completely
forgotten debate that greeted firstgeneration
voting machine technology
in the 1920s,” Pfaffenberger says.
By showing how first-generation
voting machines enabled national
party elites to reduce the autonomy
of localities, Pfaffenberger is helping
to resolve a long-running controversy
among political scientists and historians
about who was responsible for the
sweeping electoral reforms that
characterized the 1890s.
A recent $27,000 grant from
the National Science Foundation is
allowing Pfaffenberger to pursue
archival research on the topic. Already
he has found that scholars have all but
ignored the history of voting machines,
which he finds surprising given our
politically obsessed culture.
“It’s almost as if this subject
wasn’t even explored until the 2000
presidential election,” he says. “After
that, voting technology suddenly
mattered to folks.”
Pfaffenberger’s study is part of a
larger Democracy and Technology
program that he is developing
with colleagues in the University’s
Department of Science, Technology,
and Society — an initiative that has
already sparked several cross-University
collaborations and additions to the
curriculum.
“It’s fitting that this initiative is
under way at the university Thomas
Jefferson founded,” says Pfaffenberger.
“Jefferson strongly believed that
engineers need to be good citizens.
Today, the need is greater than ever,
so it’s important for science and
engineering students — indeed,
students throughout the University —
to reflect on how technologies shape
our democracy.”
|